Sunday, September 22, 2013

MPCA Experiences

You might be aware that the MPCA was in need of individuals to fill the position of President, among others.

I want to share with you my experience in volunteering for the position, which I believe highlights some of the issues in our community. The MPCA is not immune to the animosity that is shown by council. Considering that several individuals act or have previously acted on both, it's not too surprising. What is...dumbfounding (not surprising) is that during the September MPCA meeting it was stated that they desire to separate themselves from council; to create a better distinction between the two entities. There are many steps the MPCA could take to do this, but currently turn a blind eye towards.

That's a separate issue.

When I asked how to volunteer, I was forwarded to Bob Gale, who is in charge of the nominating committee.

I was asked to meet with the nominating committee, though I was out of town and not sure when I would return, as I informed Bob:


Hi Jessica,
Can you meet with the nominating committee this Sunday evening at Bonnie Townsend's house (...address removed by Jessica for privacy...) ?
Thanks, Bob

Bob,

Unfortunately I am headed out of town for an event this weekend and I'm not sure what time I will return Sunday evening. 

Is there a time scheduled? I might be cutting it close. 

Thanks,
Jessica

It is scheduled for 7pm. Sorry I did not put that in the email. Thinking we might have a full slate by Sunday

Bob,

How did the meeting go?
I'm sorry I couldn't be there; I was still in transit. 

Any word on the position?

Thanks,

Jessica 

Hi Jessica, 
Sorry we you could not attend. We have all of the officer positions filled. We might have some committee appointments open if you are interested, but won't know until the end of the month.
Regards, Bob

Bob,

I am not sure how the positions have been filled when the deadline to apply was listed as today in the Villager. 

I thought that this meeting was of the nominating committee, not a meeting to vote in the officers. 

Please help me get these facts straight so that I don't have a negative perception of why volunteers have been turned down and redirected to the positions that existing officers might prefer them to be in.

It seems to me that the process is a bit backwards, since the association has not held a public meeting to address this but apparently the officer positions are filled? Please help steer me straight in understanding how this occurred. 

Something isn't adding up and before I jump to too many conclusions about the process I'd like to know what I might be missing here.

Thanks,

Jessica

Jessica,
It was a meeting of the nominating committee last night. As of last night regardless of the deadline we had enough people to recommend for the ballot vote for the general meeting on Wednesday. No other members of MPCA were involved in approving these choices other than the nominating committee.
We waited  over 45 minutes for you hoping you would show and then went ahead with our meeting. 

Regards, Bob

After the Monday night Council meeting, where the Vice President of the MPCA heard what had happened, I received this e-mail from bob:

Jessica you can always nominate yourself when the chair calls for closing nominations in the Wednesday meeting.


It should be noted that I received notice that the meeting would start at 8:15 rather than the usual, earlier meeting time, because the sitting President was going to be traveling.

I also received verbal apology from Bonnie Townsend when she informed me to bring copies of my resume to the meeting if I was going to be nominated. (Turns out I didn't need them but that's another story)

During the meeting, Dick Busick interrogated me as to why I operate "the blog that is...insulting to many in this village.."
My response was if it is insulting it's only because the truth is something they shouldn't be proud of. 

Until the officials and personalities in charge of this village start taking accountability for their actions, and start treating all residents with equal respect regardless of their political opinions, home ownership status, or hours of volunteering put in, this village is going down the pipes. If you don't believe me based on that statement, read the Villager more critically, attend a meeting or two, or read previous posts (and comments) on this blog. 

The attitude I was met with from the "officers" of the MPCA was overall not very inviting and is the very issue as to why many people don't volunteer. If the volunteers aren't doing it in a way that "they" want, they are either turned away or redirected. That said, some of the officers did seem to try to counter balance the negativity or hostility, but until there is zero tolerance for this from both officers and attendees of the meetings, things will be very hard to change. Maybe I'm too optimistic.


5 comments:

  1. Jessica,
    I keep up with your blog and I appreciate all of the hard work that you put into this to keep the residents informed. Just a thought, but couldn't the residents that have a clue, start their own MPCA? I'm sure that it wouldn't be easy but that would ensure that it is completely apart from the politics and council. Keep up the good work.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous,

    I'm going to have to advise against creating a separate group. The problems with the village are by the few, not the many. It would be a better idea to volunteer and work from within. Jessica is correct that the truth scares people.

    I encourage anyone that wants to change the culture to get involved, even in the smallest way. Even if you're deflected or blocked, continue pushing. It isn't going to change otherwise.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It is a shame how the MPCA handled volunteering for the officer positions that were open. It is difficult to determine what the purpose of a nominating committee is since the officers are to be elected at the annual general membership meeting. What type of an election is it when there is more than one person is eligible and only one is nominated? That sounds like how a political party in a communist country would operate.

    More shameful is how some of the executive board members were towards Jessica. Asking her questions that were clearly more geared towards an interrogation laced with their own opinion in an attempt to vilify her. About as sad is it took a resident member to point out these questions seemed to be more opinions than question for it to stop since other executive board members apparently were lacking integrity or something and did nothing to stop it. It is no wonder there is a negative perception of why volunteers have been turned down or redirected to the positions that existing officers might prefer them to be in. Cannot say that is a place I would look to spend any of my time I might volunteer. Let us be optimistic and hope that some of this might change with a different mpca president, but it will not be something I hold my breath about.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I would like to point out that what Jessica says in HER blog for the most part is either positive or pointing out facts concerning the Village or meetings.

    However, many of the comments left by visitors are negative and degrade the members of Council and the Mayor. So don't blame Jessica for the comments left by people, after all, this still is America for the time being and the First Amendment gives EVERYONE the right to free speech, even if you don't agree or dislike it.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This is why people in the park do not volunteer! Dick,Sharon and Lynn Have ran people off for years. People are sick of being treated like this .

    ReplyDelete